Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/26/2018 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    Well in my own case, if my C guy, Lee, goes out, I want Marleau to move to C and to have Marleau's spot replaced by Matt Martin. How would I indicate this, since it is 2 moves? (Or is it not possible?) Also, is a PIM and an injury the same thing, as far as a guy being out? (Because an injury you are not a man down, after all?) Sorry for the confusion. In some ways I guess I am a rookie still. Edit: I found Raph's explanation message: http://forum.nhl94.c...435#entry143435 TBH I am still not 100%, but I will edit my post above to include *what I think* should be my 2nd line.
  2. 1 point
    SNES NHL '94 Jeresy Hall of fame! Nice Darrell! It has the L and R buttons on the shoulders! Wow! I have this multitap so I can get 5 players to play at the same time. I'd like to see in a SNES NHL'94 side tournament have the best players like Jammer vs 4 other players and keep track of points for the team that has the 4 players. See who wins! See if the Champ ever loses. Video tape it. Great goals, great saves and great games would happen.
  3. 1 point
    1. Offensive zone faceoff win to dman --> one-timer pass to winger in the middle 2. Faceoff to winger and accelerate towards the net immediately 3. Offensive zone faceoff win to winger against boards --> crease cut Those are the only ones I ever used.
  4. 1 point
    THIS PLACE IS ABSURD AND IS OVERFLOWING WITH SPITEFUL, VINDICTIVE, UNFAIR STAFF MEMBERS. I can no longer post in ninety-four percent of this message board, including threads I started. this is cruel and misguidedly reactionary. no transgressions have been submitted -- it is awful and the person affecting my account should not only be removed from that position of power, but they should suffer each one of the restrictions imposed on me. I insist that I am a fair-minded and considerate contributor and that nothing I have done warrants the punishments doled out exponentially and rolled back only when caught by less active (but more levelheaded and intelligent) staff. what is next? is this fair statement of facts and gentle opinions going to incite further nasty action taken against me? am I to be indefinitely banned from all corners of our community except the SNES hacking area because I dared to compare the perpetuation of the cool-kids club to the constant cycle of marginalized newcomers failing to crack the glass ceiling and quitting in frustration? IS THIS FAIR TO THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE OR IS IT JUST A SLOPPY ATTEMPT TO MAINTAIN POWER IN THE FACE OF INQUIRIES, TO CENSOR, TO STIFLE DISSENT AND QUESTS FOR IMPROVING THIS PLACE BY MAKING IT EQUITABLE BY SIMPLY TYPING TRUTH TO POWER?