Also, is nhlgamer.com gone for good or just moved?

I don’t have a schedule, games played format, or anything in mind I’d rather just gauge if there is true interest from enough coaches to get this going.

The foundation would be 4 captains, and ideally 12 coaches in the player pool to draft from giving each team 4 players making it easier to play games with more options to choose from from availability stand point.

At worst 4 Captains, and 4 coach draft pool for 4 teams.

While 12 coach draft pool is ideal, a 8 coach draft pool is the next ideal situation, and gives each team a 3rd coach to help get games played from an availability stand point.

This is just an outline, IF we have more interest in this from say some 2v2 old timers we can add more teams 5, or 6, but that’s probably a pipe dream.

I have an idea for the 4 captains, hopefully they are on board, and willing to be captains, without those 4, or someone coming in unexpectedly who is captain worthy this idea for a league won’t go anywhere, and if there are not at least 4 more interested parties other then the captains it goes nowhere, hopefully we get all 4 captains on board, and 8 other guys interested in participating in a 2v2 league.

ANYONE interested please reply here, and if you have any ideas on how the league should go down add those in your reply.

Lets Make 2v2 Great Again!

hello?

Everyone will or should agree with this: 2on2 is one of the toughest league to put on, mainly because it is really hard to schedule gas involving 4 coaches. Even little tourney such as the yearly 2on2 Christmas tourney were struggling in GPs, mainly because of this problem, but also because of a lack of commitment or will by the subscribed coaches. However, 2on2 remains one of the greatest asset of nhl 94 online. Playing with a partner and against 2 human beings really involves the game experiment and allows you to really feel the hockey game, which is one of the greatest team sports of all time. Seriously, what feels better than a perfect combination of passes, finished with a turific one timer in a 2on2 game? Nothing, this is the edge of being in the GA, this is where you can feel GA itself inside your body, where you can feel the HOKKEEFAN experiment.

In myopinion, the reason most 2on2 leagues failed is because of the fact that everyone was paired with a specific partner, which made it harder for everyone to schedule the games. Also, the large amount of slackers in those leagues or tourneys didn’t help at all either. Kupuck came up with a solution in his league, but personally, being in a 2on2 team with like 8 gas involved reduces too much of the personal accomplishment of great 2on2 games.

What I propose is a 2on2 league based on your individual ranking. You can play with whoever you want, against whoever you want, and you will get attributed points for Ws or Ls individually (im thinking 3pts for a W and 1pt for a L). The top 4 coaches with the most points can after draft another coach from spot 5 to 8, to create a little playoff tourney with elimination. At this part, it becomes the classical 2on2 way where you have a partner assigned, but here, only the guys who played lots of games and who were really involved in the season will get a chance to play, so I think
this could be a way to eliminate the scums and the slackers.

Simple rules:

• Maximum of 4 games with the same guy, (otherwise, 2 good guys could just destroy everyone and complete their 25gps)
• You can play as many games as you want, but you will only get points for your 1st 25gps. However, you can still be a legitimate opponent to whoever wants to face you.
• W = 3pts L = 1pt

What you guys thinks? Is there some interest for this kind of s**t? I thought this could replace the unfinished summit or so…! We just can’t let 2on2 die O_O