Love the effort put into these rankings (in fact, love all the effort all of you put into this league and forum, don't know where you guys find the time but none of you get the credit you deserve...)
I'm a newbie to the league, and currently a SNES 'B' leaguer.
You say the B league is half as good but here's the problem with that assumption. No matter how good someone is, in their first year they have no choice but to be in the B league. At least that's what I was told.
Now I'm not saying I'm the best, far from it. But if skill is not a requirement for placing teams in the A and B leagues and seniority plays a part, you can't make assumptions about the B leaguers skills until they have played at least one full season.
I pretty much can guarantee that if you took 1 random person from the A league and 1 from the B legue and they faced off, either could win. I definitely believe in having diff. leagues based on skill when the demand to join isso high, but in the future, why not use a relegation system (kind of like soccer) and move A guys down and B guys up based on performance. That way A leagueres may be able to actually claim their the better league! Until then, I know which A leaguers are better players but REFUSE to accept the A league as a better league based on skill! Although you guys certainly have a better games played ratio!!!
Good luck to the 'A' leaguers and whoever wins should play te B league champion, just for kicks...
ps - my good friend is an A leaguer and he's rated like 8 times better than me and that's what is really bothering me since I can kick his butt!