Great job with the rosters/logos, etc in the 94 version.
Did you use a lower ratings scale for more realistic flow of play? I was noticing that some of the players that had injury struggles, but are otherwise great players (ie: Crosby/Gaborik) seem to have suffered in overall rating. Is this a conscious move to reflect the season's stats only, or would you welcome some feedback on players that seem off?
Thanks again.