Jump to content
NHL'94 Forums

Flames4LifeFLA

Members
  • Posts

    523
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Flames4LifeFLA

  1. Nah - not interested in moving Theo - he will be making his home at the Fabulous Forum this season.

    Just keep him a safe distance away from the hookers and blow.

    On a separate note, will entertain offers for Phil Housley, if anyone is interested...a forward of similar rating would be requested. Doesn't have to be a one-for-one, could just be a starting point...

  2. Thank you Smozoma, I really appreciate your help. I went ahead and got GENS 2.11, however, I am having some difficulty with the gens_netplaysave.zip file at the bottom. I have saved the file to my computer, but when I try to extract the files, Windows says the zip file is empty...

  3. The Calgary Flames would like to say hello to their fans watching the draft live, at their draft party at the Pengrowth Saddledome. We would also like to thank the Genesis Draft League and the gracious city of (fill in the blank) for all of their wonderful hospitality for this event.

    With the twenty-third selection in the first round of the draft, the Calgary Flames are proud to select goaltender, Grant Fuhr.

  4. I'll leave it up to you guys to create divsion and conference names if you want to use them. But make them reasonable, if i see things like the "PWNAGE CONFERENCE" or the "CROSSCUTTER DIVISION" they will stay Conference 1 and Division 4. :(

    The Mark Lesser and Ron Barr conferences, respectively, are a cool way to go still IMO. A reasonable, historically-significant homage to 2 names that are synonomous with NHL '94.

    I'm not sure about division names...maybe someone can think of some possible names that would be cool to use/have on a consistent basis. Kinda create some consistency in what they would be from year-to-year, instead of always changing. Too bad we don't have a few more historical figures around the community, a la having the Patrick, Adams, Norris, Smythe...

  5. Dude, I loved that logo and jerseys too! Had the winter jacket with the logo on the back. It was my 'chick magnet' back in the day.

    And...ummmm.... a major source of ridicule amongst my buddies.

    Peace it

    LOL, I would've never believed they sold a winter jacket with that logo on the back, too cool! The lighthouse on the shoulder was a pretty sharp design too, I thought...

  6. I think we also have to remember how last year was last year, in terms of rosters. You will have a different draft order for this upcoming season, which might (or might not) mean that last year's "stronger" teams won't have the same personnel this season. The balance of power within rosters could shift and change...

  7. Now that is an awesome idea!!!

    I also liked the methodology of how you placed 2 of each category based on results into each division.

    Well that's good, maybe one good thing came out of my posting. In no way, shape or form did I mean to undermine your efforts, DaDonch, so I really hope you aren't ticked at me for throwing that out there. If anything, maybe it saves you some time to do other league housework things or, maybe gives you a framework from which to work.

    I'm sure everyone has their own ideas and preferences about who should be where and what's fair, etc. Just like almost everything in life, nobody is really ever going to be fully satisfied. But maybe with attempting to balance out the divisions (2 top, 2 mid, 2 lower) while having some semblance of this looking like a bona fide league (with real rivalries, geography), it can be a foundation from which to work?

    We can sit here and deliberate all day about who should be in what division and what seems fair- the common goal here is an equal playing field within the parameters of having a draft. So, just like in any real league, no matter the divisional alignment, it all boils down to playing the games. Winning games and getting points wins divisions and championships, not which division someone is in.

    Anyhow, at least I felt that the model above seemed fairly reasonable and a good place to start from? Ok, now everyone can rip it up (this means you Carse)!

  8. OK, try and follow me here because you knew I couldn't stop myself from doing this...

    RON BARR CONFERENCE (12) MARC LESSER CONFERENCE (12)

    WEST (6) CENTRAL (6) NORTH (6) EAST (6)

    Detroit (EA) Winnipeg (KG) Montreal (HABS) New York (VOC)

    St. Louis (CRSE) Colorado (TP666) Buffalo (AJ93) Tampa Bay (GR8199) TOP 8 FROM LAST YEAR

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    L.A. (KGCPRN93) Vancouver (DMC) Minnesota (SRC99) Ottawa (SKLYRD)

    Chicago (BHF) Anaheim (DDNCH44) Boston (HKEFN) Quebec (TSSLOG) MID 8 FROM LAST YEAR

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dallas (SMOZM) Calgary (JAM) Pittsburgh (MTHRRY) Philadelphia (NJKLLR)

    San Jose (EDSRX) Edmonton (AWSMRNO) Toronto (ICSTRM70) New Jersey (SSIG) BOT 8 FROM LAST YEAR AND NEW

    Darn, that came out horrible without margins...

    RON BARR CONFERENCE

    WESTERN DIVISION

    Anaheim (DaDonch)

    Calgary (Jamonica)

    Colorado (TakeYourPill666)

    Edmonton (Awesomerino)

    Vancouver (Dmac)

    Winnipeg (KGMan)

    CENTRAL DIVISION

    Chicago (Backhandfloater)

    Dallas (Smozoma)

    Detroit (EricAnthony)

    Los Angeles (KingsCupRun93)

    San Jose (Ediesaurusrex)

    St. Louis (Carse)

    MARC LESSER CONFERENCE

    NORTHERN DIVISION

    Boston (Hokkeefan2)

    Buffalo (AngryJay93)

    Minnesota (Scribe99)

    Montreal (HABS)

    Pittsburgh (Matt Hurray)

    Toronto* (IceStorm70)

    EASTERN DIVISION

    New Jersey* (SSiG)

    New York Rangers (Vocally Caged)

    Ottawa (Skoolyardpuck)

    Philadelphia (NewJerseyKillers)

    Quebec (TessLog)

    Tampa Bay (Gr8199Kings)

    * = flip-flop?

    (Each division has 2 top-8 teams, 2 mid-8 teams and 2 lower-8 teams)

  9. This might not be the right place to do it but as long as we're talking about doing it fair during the lottery picks, I think we also need to consider division alignment.

    As of right now, you would have BHF, Carse, KGman and myself plus a couple more from the NW and Pacific in one division. So I really think there needs to be consideration to realign these divisions.

    OK, try and follow me here because you knew I couldn't stop myself from doing this...

    RON BARR CONFERENCE (12) MARC LESSER CONFERENCE (12)

    WEST (6) CENTRAL (6) NORTH (6) EAST (6)

    Detroit (EA) Winnipeg (KG) Montreal (HABS) New York (VOC)

    St. Louis (CRSE) Colorado (TP666) Buffalo (AJ93) Tampa Bay (GR8199) TOP 8 FROM LAST YEAR

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    L.A. (KGCPRN93) Vancouver (DMC) Minnesota (SRC99) Ottawa (SKLYRD)

    Chicago (BHF) Anaheim (DDNCH44) Boston (HKEFN) Quebec (TSSLOG) MID 8 FROM LAST YEAR

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dallas (SMOZM) Calgary (JAM) Pittsburgh (MTHRRY) Philadelphia (NJKLLR)

    San Jose (EDSRX) Edmonton (AWSMRNO) Toronto (ICSTRM70) New Jersey (SSIG) BOT 8 FROM LAST YEAR AND NEW

×
×
  • Create New...