IQ25 Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 Aw, no need to be cynical now. The stadium was really red in there, you know. Unless you mean here in the boards? I was just bringing up how Washington had their building half-filled every game before the lockout. Glad to see they gained some more fans. DO U SMOKE CRACK No. But thanks for asking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wags13 Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 Prepare for Pittsburgh South on Saturday and Monday. I've been to about as many Caps-Pens games in DC as I have in Pittsburgh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HABS Posted April 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 SECOND ROUND SERIES PRICES 06:05 PM 123 Chicago Blackhawks +122 Risk To Win 124 Vancouver Canucks -132 Risk To Win 04:05 PM 121 Anaheim Ducks +270 Risk To Win 122 Detroit Red Wings -300 Risk To Win 04:35 PM 127 Carolina Hurricanes +191 Risk To Win 128 Boston Bruins -211 Risk To Win 10:05 AM 125 Pittsburgh Penguins +111 Risk To Win 126 Washington Capitals -121 Risk To Win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HABS Posted April 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 Ill take Chicago in 6 anaheim in 6 carolina in 7 pittsburgh in 7 DOGGGIES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orangeblack92 Posted April 29, 2009 Report Share Posted April 29, 2009 Detroit in 5 Chicago in 7 Boston in 6 Washington in 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IQ25 Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 LOL @ Vancouver and Boston . . . Conference Finals: Chicago over Detroit in 6 Pittsburgh over Carolina in 7 Stanley Cup Finals: Pittsburgh over Chicago in 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orangeblack92 Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Detroit in 7 Pittsburgh in 5 I want chicago and carolina but i really dont think either will win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedWingDevil Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Never say never. If the Ducks played hard against the Red Wings, the Hawks will pound the crud out of them. Detriot's got its work cut it for them. My picks: Pittsburgh wins in 6 vs Carolina. The Canes had a nice run, but I feel this will be as far as they can go. Upset special: Chigago wins it in 7. They beat good teams in Calgary and Vancouver; Detriot will be their biggest test... and they will pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freydey Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 hurricanez and jussfied in 7 wingars and franzinized in 6 2002! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carse Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 PITT in 5 Wings in 6.. although i want the hawks badly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wags13 Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 hurricanez and jussfied in 7wingars and franzinized in 6 2002! Montreal in 1924 when there was a 1 in 6 chance you could win it all. LETS GO PENS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clockwise Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Ward has yet to lose a playoff series in his young career, and I think Chicago has the longest Championship drought of any NHL franchise (since '61?). Something has to give. Hopefully the Hawks advance, they've been hockey purgatory since Roenick skipped town. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HABS Posted May 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Ill take Chicago in 6 YEPP EXACTOanaheim in 6 NEIN! carolina in 7 YEPP EXACTO pittsburgh in 7 YEPP EXACTO DOGGGIES 3-1 with some exact picks nice. Wish I actually bet these picks fock! Next round 12:05 PM Chicago Blackhawks +183 Risk To Win Detroit Red Wings -201 Risk To Win 04:35 PM Carolina Hurricanes +181 Risk To Win Pittsburgh Penguins -196 Risk To Win Ill take Detroit in 6 Carolina in 7 2002 finals rematch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flames4LifeFLA Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 (edited) Deleted Edited April 5, 2018 by Flames4LifeFLA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Pittsburgh in 7. (I'm so tired of Carolina) Chicago in 7. (This team has a sick way to comeback in a game) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freydey Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 That you were good 100 years ago. Congrats for no longer being relevant! lol 35yo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Russian Rocket Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 ..and this changes Montreal's relevancy how? Oh..it doesn't. Keep living in the past Habs fans, and watch the present/future tonight. That's probably why our last cup is more recent then your's. Btw, if you don't win the Cup, it doesn't matter if you finish 30th or 2nd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smozoma Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 you're all just jealous of my Leafs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruePensFan1981 Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 Penguins best scorers1990 to 1995 Lemieux Right for the most part, except Jagr led the Pens in scoring in the 94-95 season while Lemieux took a one-year medical leave. 1995 to 1997 Jagr Jagr led the team in scoring in 94-95 during Lemieux's medical leave. Lemieux won the Ross in 95-96 and 96-97. Get your facts straight. 1997 to 2000 Kovalev KOVALEV? You friggin' serious? Kovalev NEVER led the Pens in scoring. EVER! 2002... Dick Tarnstrom? Yeah, Tarnstrom led an unbelievably bad team in scoring as he racked up the powerplay points. WHAT'S YOUR POINT? Phil Housley led his team in scoring before. Bobby Orr led his team in scoring. Brian Leetch led his team in scoring. Paul Coffey may have done the same with Edmonton if it weren't for Gretzky's dominance. Tarnstrom wasn't the first time a d-man ever led a team in scoring, and might not be the last time, either. I don't know what's more lame... your trash talk or the fact that your own trash talk is filled with more errors than an ESPN fact sheet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wags13 Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 Dick Tarnstrom just makes FPB feel better and fills that hole in his soul that being a Habs fan creates with the endless disappointment. Funny part is, the Habs of 2009 could use the Dick Tarnstrom of 2002. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Russian Rocket Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 Right for the most part, except Jagr led the Pens in scoring in the 94-95 season while Lemieux took a one-year medical leave.Jagr led the team in scoring in 94-95 during Lemieux's medical leave. Lemieux won the Ross in 95-96 and 96-97. Get your facts straight. KOVALEV? You friggin' serious? Kovalev NEVER led the Pens in scoring. EVER! Yeah, Tarnstrom led an unbelievably bad team in scoring as he racked up the powerplay points. WHAT'S YOUR POINT? Phil Housley led his team in scoring before. Bobby Orr led his team in scoring. Brian Leetch led his team in scoring. Paul Coffey may have done the same with Edmonton if it weren't for Gretzky's dominance. Tarnstrom wasn't the first time a d-man ever led a team in scoring, and might not be the last time, either. I don't know what's more lame... your trash talk or the fact that your own trash talk is filled with more errors than an ESPN fact sheet. This wasn't made to be accurate, simply to point out the fact, that, for having such a good core of players now, you guys really sucked balls back in the 2000's. And no, it has nothing to do with the fact that it was a defenseman, just that it was DICK TARNSTROM! And that having him as your best scorer, will always be a stain on the organization. And also, that for again having this core, you finished in the bottom 5 for 4 years in a row. Twice having the 1st pick in 3 years, that's sucking. Anyways conversation over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrodimus Posted May 20, 2009 Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 Bro, you're arguing with a 15 year old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceStorm70 Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Topic cleaned up and re-opened per Habs request. Please keep it clean. It's ok to rip on each others teams. No need to take it personally and attack one another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IQ25 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 lol they touched it . . . STANLEY CUP FINAL Pittsburgh over Detroit in 6 bet you $200 Detroit's announcer will say Steven Crosby again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HABS Posted May 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Pittsburgh in 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wags13 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 lol they touched it . . . STANLEY CUP FINAL Pittsburgh over Detroit in 6 bet you $200 Detroit's announcer will say Steven Crosby again Lemieux skated with it twice and he won Cups, as did Scott Stevens, as did Steve Yzerman... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IQ25 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Lemieux skated with it twice and he won Cups, as did Scott Stevens, as did Steve Yzerman... I`m just saying they touched it, and i did pick pittsburgh to win the cup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orangeblack92 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Detroit in 5 yeah i said it, FIVE!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TubaHero Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 i'm not even sure how anyone could even think of pittsburgh to win it. watching detroit, they've been a machine on ice out there. im not saying pittsburgh is lookin bad, im just saying that detroit is looking legendary. i say detroit in 6, although i wouldnt even be surprised to see a sweep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freydey Posted May 29, 2009 Report Share Posted May 29, 2009 6wings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.