halfMANhalfDONUT Posted March 6, 2015 Report Share Posted March 6, 2015 I want you guys, the SNES players, to rank the teams. I think the team ratings that come with the game are pretty bogus, but I want to see how the community feels about it. http://goo.gl/forms/FlW3EPbZYP This is a simple form, just rate the teams on a scale of 1 to 5. Think of it like Amazon reviews. If that team is amazing, they should be a 5. If they're garbage, they should be a 1. Try to be as objective as possible and leave your love or hate for a given team to the side I'm going to leave the responses hidden for a bit, but I'll open them up in about a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halifax Posted March 7, 2015 Report Share Posted March 7, 2015 Awesome stuff. Thanks bud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smozoma Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 Can you link to the results? I'm just curious to see them (I couldn't rank them, I don't play SNES enough(ever)) EDIT: oh silly me, they're secret for now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfMANhalfDONUT Posted March 11, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 So far we only have 8 responses, 2 of them being me and HeatRash. Kind of disappointing.. I'll give it a couple more days. If you have a bud who hasn't yet responded, please have them do so! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfMANhalfDONUT Posted March 14, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 Ok, we got 10 responses. Here are the results: Here are individual responses: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mfs2f_Al0BI1-2vOdAjr4SxPVc3fdkeoKZpTGRrv3uw/edit?usp=sharing And here is a chart of the averages: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mfs2f_Al0BI1-2vOdAjr4SxPVc3fdkeoKZpTGRrv3uw/pubchart?oid=675815922&format=interactive TEAM RANKINGS (10 Responses) 1. (4.7) Detroit Red Wings 2. (4.5) LA Kings T-3. (4.3) Boston Bruings T-3. (4.3) Calgary Flames T-3. (4.3) Chicago Blackhawks T-3. (4.3) Pittsburgh Penguins 7. (4.1) NY Rangers T-8. (3.9) Montreal Canadiens T-8. (3.9) Vancouver Canucks 10. (3.7) Quebec Nordiques 11. (3.6) Toronto Maple Leafs 12. (3.5) Winnipeg Jets 13. (3.3) Buffalo Sabres T-14. (3.2) NY Islanders T-14. (3.2) Washington Capitals T-16. (3.1) Dallas Stars T-16. (3.1) Edmonton Oilers T-16. (3.1) St Louis Blues 19. (3.0) Philadelphia Flyers 20. (2.9) New Jersey Devils 21. (2.6) Hartford Whalers 22. (1.6) Tampa Bay Lightning 23. (1.4) San Jose Sharks 24. (1.2) Ottawa Senators 25. (1.1) Anaheim Mighty Ducks 26. (1.0) Florida Panthers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smozoma Posted March 14, 2015 Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 Interesting, having a decent goalie does nothing for Florida. (They do have beezer in SNES, right?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfMANhalfDONUT Posted March 14, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2015 (edited) He really is quite good for the auto goalie, but their team is SO abominably slow and inept at shooting. That's what really kills them. Some games, when they're hot (and usually if you put Hough in), they can get a little fire in their bellies. But for the most part, yeah, awful team. Someone who is good with maths should create some sort of X-Factor for these teams. It'd come in handy when comparing teams in a head-to-head for user stats. Maybe something like: -0.7 DET-0.6 LAK-0.5 BOS-0.5 CAL-0.5 CHI-0.5 PIT-0.4 NYR-0.3 MTL-0.3 VAN-0.2 QUE-0.1 TOR-0.1 WPG0.0 BUF0.0 NYI0.0 WAS0.1 DAL0.1 EDM0.1 STL0.2 PHI0.3 NJ0.4 HFD0.7 TB0.8 SJ0.9 OTT0.9 ANA1.0 FLA Edited March 14, 2015 by marchawg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.