hokkeefan Posted November 13, 2016 Report Share Posted November 13, 2016 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HABS Posted November 14, 2016 Report Share Posted November 14, 2016 W t f...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smozoma Posted November 14, 2016 Report Share Posted November 14, 2016 Guilt trips are always the best way to get people to behave how you'd like them to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halifax Posted November 14, 2016 Report Share Posted November 14, 2016 (Phew) my name is not on there....and neither is anyone elses. We are all equal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokkeefan Posted November 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2016 Hahahahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aqualizard Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 I do think there SHOULD be a list, but not a "rank" from best to worst. Just a good and bad, where only "poor" warrant comment. Like: "Guys in Good Standing" - name 1 - name 2 - name 3 "Guys in Poor Standing" - name 1 - bailed on VHL3, missed 20% of games in Fall Classic 2016 - name 2 - disappeared completely in middle of Fall Classic 2016 ... etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jer_33 Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 (edited) League completion stat. Sounds easy - but just like calculating DNP's, I think the guys with the lower number of games should be penalized more and their unplayed opponents should be penalized less. Hope that makes sense. I feel like it's always a handful of guys that everybody is hunting for games with - these are the guys who should recieve poor marks, and not so much the guys who are making the effort. Edited November 17, 2016 by jer_33 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smozoma Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 I think the guys with the lower number of games should be penalized more and their unplayed opponents should be penalized less. I had this in Blitz Each DNP'ed game was worth a total of -2 points split between the two players. The points were shared between the 2 participants in the ratio of their total DNPs. So if one guy had 3 DNP games and the other had 1, the first guy got -1.5 and the other guy got -0.5. Maybe that could be expanded to take into account previous season DNPs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.