Jump to content
NHL'94 Forums

Classic vs WBF


Recommended Posts

I have been playing a ton of 94 on the Original Equipment.

Both against the computer and against Live competition.

I have found Classic roms to be far better/crazier/I am not sure of the word than WBF roms.

Anybody else feel that difference?  Agree?

Also as @Matt55 pointed out when playing the computer "big" guys will level you so the WBF is actually in effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd expect the original to be more "energetic" because as the user you'll use the light guys more, and they are generally faster.

With the weight bug fix, is it the light CPU players that hit? I probably reversed that because I don't think I disabled CB in smozROM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with smoz, but it's been a while since I played a WBF or Blitz ROM.  Pre-CB era.  Biggest difference I remember was using heavy guys like Neely, Messier, Lindros, etc, which lent itself to an overall slower game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses and yes I could see where what you are saying is true, but I am basically using the same guys in either rom.

To me there seems to be something else and unknown element.

Anyway no big deal, as a side note the Historic/Retro players benefit from the Wt. Bug!:big_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...