Nhl94slapshot

Which player got hosed the most?

Recommended Posts

So overall, I think the NHL 94 ratings are pretty good...but a few players must've gone home to their kids playing this game and been like, "Why aren't you putting me in the starting lineup?" Kids would be like, "You're a 2/2 skater and a 69 overall... can't make Mario play with one hand tied behind his back." Rick Tocchet then breaks the Sega.  He's my pick for completely hosed... there's some others that I would guess weren't happy either, but Tocchet was 14th in scoring that year (1 pt behind Bure and 2 pts ahead of Roenick).  Just think if NHL 94 given him the indestructible qualities of big 27...world could be different now.  Sometimes, when I really get to thinking deeply, I power on the Sega and select Pittsburgh and I start to put in Tocchet...and then I put in Stevens instead 'cause I can't do that to Mario.  Any other players you think got hosed more than Tocchet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somewhere on here, someone found a picture of the original Chicago ratings sheet (like a piece of paper with the ratings written on it, and notes about what lines they're on), and they're basically identical to the game, except for some reason the Michel Goulet got totally hosed in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yeah...good call...whenever I play with Chicago, I want to put in Goulet but man he's so slow and that shot:(

21 minutes ago, smozoma said:

 Michel Goulet got totally hosed in the game.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gretzky got hosed bad. He should have had slightly more shot power and a lot more accuracy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Bob Kudelski said:

Gretzky got hosed bad. He should have had slightly more shot power and a lot more accuracy. 

Gretzky had a bit of a muffin shot in the 90s.  His accuracy was based on his 92-93 shot % so it might accurate.  Although, a little bump would be nice due to rep.

Brian Leetch should be a four speed not a three.  Dude could fly and was one of the best puck moving dmen of that era.  Whereas, Luc Robitaille, for example, was a slow skater and yet, is rated a four. Things like that can be “annoying” but not a deterrent from playing.  Ray Bourque is rated too high in shot accuracy, for example, based on how he did in 92-93 vs how others were rated.  So, the rating logic is inconsistent there.  So, if he was rated on rep than several other dmen were hosed.

I do agree about Michel Goulet.

If anything, some of the fourth liners or 5-7 dman may have got “hosed.”  By default, most are given slow speed, low stick handling and weak shots.  Not all of it is accurate.

Maybe a few backup goalies could have been rated a little higher?  Hard to say.

All sports games have that one player who got hosed.  EA has it every year and usually it’s several players.  It’s the irony of “if it’s in the game, it’s in the game.”

Edited by The Sauce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, The Sauce said:

Gretzky had a bit of a muffin shot in the 90s.  His accuracy was based on his 92-93 shot % so it might accurate.  Although, a little bump would be nice due to rep.

Brian Leetch should be a four speed not a three.  Dude could fly and was one of the best puck moving dmen of that era.  Whereas, Luc Robitaille, for example, was a slow skater and yet, is rated a four. Things like that can be “annoying” but not a deterrent from playing.  Ray Bourque is rated too high in shot accuracy, for example, based on how he did in 92-93 vs how others were rated.  So, the rating logic is inconsistent there.  So, if he was rated on rep than several other dmen were hosed.

I do agree about Michel Goulet.

If anything, some of the fourth liners or 5-7 dman may have got “hosed.”  By default, most are given slow speed, low stick handling and weak shots.  Not all of it is accurate.

Maybe a few backup goalies could have been rated a little higher?  Hard to say.

All sports games have that one player who got hosed.  EA has it every year and usually it’s several players.  It’s the irony of “if it’s in the game, it’s in the game.”

Goulet was in the twilight of his career, similar to Stastny, so I don't mind that their ratings aren't great. 

Gretzky is a bit different. In the early 90's, he was still putting up 100+ point seasons and averaging around .45 goals per game.

I agree a bump up based on his resume should have been warranted. The whole idea of basing the shot accuracy rating on one season of shooting percentage is flawed IMO, but I get why they did it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Lafontaine (2nd in scoring in the league) should've had a higher rating...95-96.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hard to predict rookie success, but... Kovalev.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/20/2020 at 8:49 PM, The Sauce said:

Ray Bourque is rated too high in shot accuracy, for example, based on how he did in 92-93 vs how others were rated.  So, the rating logic is inconsistent there.  So, if he was rated on rep than several other dmen were hosed.

I would bet that Bourque's rating was based on his results over the years during the accuracy shooting at the skills competition, and not on any actual gameplay. That leads me to this, brought to you instantly from the brain of Derp: How did the programers know who was actuall good? Did they have scouts? Did they scout?!?

- Gretzky got hosed.

- I feel the same about Kovalev, @trudatman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mr. Derp said:

I would bet that Bourque's rating was based on his results over the years during the accuracy shooting at the skills competition, and not on any actual gameplay. That leads me to this, brought to you instantly from the brain of Derp: How did the programers know who was actuall good? Did they have scouts? Did they scout?!?

- Gretzky got hosed.

- I feel the same about Kovalev, @trudatman

Igor Kuperman did the ratings -- check out this cool page from his original ratings: https://forum.nhl94.com/index.php?/topic/18931-page-from-igor-kupermans-original-ratings/&tab=comments#comment-176720

Some of the stats are linked to the actual results from the 92-93 season such as shot accuracy, and I forget which others.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎5‎/‎19‎/‎2020 at 6:06 PM, Mr. Derp said:

I would bet that Bourque's rating was based on his results over the years during the accuracy shooting at the skills competition, and not on any actual gameplay. That leads me to this, brought to you instantly from the brain of Derp: How did the programers know who was actuall good? Did they have scouts? Did they scout?!?

- Gretzky got hosed.

- I feel the same about Kovalev, @trudatman

There are few players who have juiced attributes.  It's ok though.  It adds an element of fear/concern/strategy when you play against them.  In some cases, certain players have attributes that are incorrect (e.g - Robitaille was not a fast skater, Leetch was a quick skater, etc.).  I don't think it hurts the game play experience very much.  Yes, they did make guys like Ed Belfour super human.  He was a good goalie who was solid in the early 90s, and had a good year in 1992-93, but he wasn't better than Roy, at that time.  But, whatever.  It's an easy thing to debate (as stats can be misleading) but not worth it given how epic the game is for us fans.

As for Gretzky, he did get a "little hosed" because he was hurt most of 1992-93 and EA bases attribute ratings on prior year performance (with the obvious exception of Ray Bourque and his shot accuracy).  Still, Gretzky had 65 points in 45 games and he rebounded very nicely in 1993-94.  But, the 90s saw his goal production go down as he became a full-on "playmaker."  His skating declined and his shot power was never that good.  That said, I'm not sure where one would bump his attributes.  He's still got a good rating.

With Kovalev, he was a young player, fresh in the league at that time.  His 1992-93 season was nothing special as he hadn't reached his star power yet.  The one area that he is inaccurately rated is his stickhandling.  The guy was a legend with the puck on his blade.  He also had an underrated wrist shot (even though there is no rating for that skill) and while not a fast skater, had good edge work/balance.  He played the game at a slower pace and some misconstrued him as lazy or overrated in his early years.  My guess is, whoever scouted him, for this game, didn't know much about him and rated him conservatively.  But, he had only been in the league for a year so I kinda get why he is not rated like a superstar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gretzky no doubt.

His playoff stats should have boosted him. He should have been on a level closer to Lemieux but as it was he was weak in the game.

You didn't even want him at center due to his shooting limitations. Sometimes you would even not have him on the first line due to his limitations and that strong passers not getting much rewarded for that attribute compared to shooters.

Look at his playoff stats that same year. He took LA to the Stanley Cup final scoring 15 goals 25 assists 40 points in 24 games. Shooting percentage of over 19%. Scored most points of the playoffs. Yes, he was hosed. Gretzky was still Gretzky back then and it is not reflected in the game.

       

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 14 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online