Jump to content
NHL'94 Forums

Setar

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Setar

  1. I'm thinking of a small tournament for the winter, but it will only have 26 entrants (one to a team). Also, you don't get to pick teams, I assign teams based on what level you played in and, if applicable, your playoff results. If you were in both levels, I take the worse record - for example, addisonbr didn't do so hot in A with Edmonton, but only lost 3 as Chicago in B, however, Chicago isn't an accurate team to measure skill with. You also get priority if you didn't play, however, people with bad league records will get the top teams, then I'll go people who didn't play, then everyone else. So the entrant from a B league who did the worst (unless someone who did worse and was in A enters) gets Chicago, and the best entrant from A (unless someone who did better in B enters) gets the worst team remaining.

  2. You can't give the goalie the puck in the offensive zone - the game does have the rule in it where goalies cannot handle the puck past the red line (instituted in 1966 or 67 after Gary Smith of Toronto attempted to score a goal and was decked by J.C. Tremblay of the Canadiens) and the game will automatically halt play when the goalie gets the puck. Also, when you change value D51C at offset 00018D9E, which makes the goalie go up with the rush, the goalie won't enter the goal crease.

    Maybe if we alter this enough we could get a modified ROM for seven-man hockey.

  3. yeah,i just talked to hokkefan and were down. i hope i dont let you down, but this hokkefan guy has my number so far.

    Hey, you have reason to play better.

    So am I commentating or are you guys just playing it? If I'm commentating I need to get my recording set up and we need to see if this works.

  4. Since it's only an hour until the deadline, it's not likely that much change will happen in the playoff picture. So here we go: Round One predictions.

    Wales Conference A

    1. Washington (28-10-2-0) vs. 8. Pittsburgh (15-25-0-0)

    Prediction: Washington in 5

    2. Hartford (27-6-0-7) vs. 7. Florida (17-22-1-0)

    Prediction: Hartford in 4

    3. Philadelphia (24-16-0-0) vs. 6. Quebec (18-20-1-1)

    Prediction: Philadelphia in 6

    4. Montreal (22-17-1-0) vs. 5. Boston (19-18-3-0)

    Prediction: Montreal in 6

    Campbell Conference A

    1. Chicago (32-8-0-0) vs. 8. Dallas (12-25-0-3)

    Prediction: Chicago in 4

    2. Winnipeg (30-9-0-1) vs. 7. Calgary (15-25-0-0)

    Prediction: Winnipeg in 7

    3. Detroit (28-12-0-0) vs. 6. Los Angeles (16-24-0-0)

    Prediction: Detroit in 6

    4. Toronto (20-20-0-0) vs. 5. Vancouver (20-20-0-0)

    Prediction: Vancouver in 7 (This was tough to call. VERY tough)

    Wales Conference B

    1. N.Y. Rangers (23-16-1-0) vs. 8. N.Y. Islanders (14-23-3-0)

    Prediction: Rangers in 6

    2. Boston (20-16-4-0) vs. 7. Montreal (15-18-1-6)

    Prediction: Boston in 4

    3. Pittsburgh (23-13-0-4) vs. 6. Quebec (15-23-2-0)

    Prediction: Pittsburgh in 5

    4. Buffalo (17-20-3-0) vs. 5. Washington (15-15-2-8)

    Prediction: Buffalo in 4

    Campbell Conference B

    1. Chicago (37-3-0-0) vs. 8. Los Angeles (12-26-2-0)

    Prediction: Chicago in 4

    2. Vancouver (30-10-0-0) vs. 7. Detroit (14-24-1-0)

    Prediction: Vancouver in 5

    3. St. Louis (32-8-0-0) vs. 6. Edmonton (19-21-0-0)

    Prediction: St. Louis in 5

    4. Toronto (27-13-0-0) vs. 5. Winnipeg (24-16-0-0)

    Prediction: Winnipeg in 7

    Yeah, not many upsets there. However, the ones I see going 6 or 7 could be upsets. I also say Boston and Buffalo in four because of the DNPs their opponents got, so a series forfeit is the equivalent of forfeiting the first four games and thus being swept. We'll just hav eto wait for the playoffs to start to find out what happens.

  5. Actually if you want to know, his tying goal was a one-timer from behind the icing line in the corner that somehow made it in the net on an impossible angle.. but I only said that because you mentioned the lucky part... I've had my share of BS fluke goals in the past too, so it's no excuse ;)

    I also say fluke.

  6. So we played our game, he won 6-5 in overtime. He just kept coming back after I'd score (and he'd whine about the non-existant lag).

    After the game, he had the following wonderfully cheerful things to say:

    JUST the kind of person we need in our league!!

    In a way, I was somewhat hoping he'd win, just because if he lost, he wouldn't have logged the game, and I'd be stuck at 39GP...

    Terrible.

    And he'd have gotten a DNP for it because he didn't log it.

×
×
  • Create New...