Setar
-
Posts
182 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Setar
-
-
If Philly beats Boston, you'll face Philly, not Buffalo.
-
I think we need to pick teams different.
Personally I love competition & would rather see the weak players
draw teams 1st.
No Rudy with Det, Caper with Pitts, etc....
I'm not complaining I just want to give the weaker players a chance
I'll even take the last pick
This would mean I'd get the first pick, having not played in any of the leagues - everyone else here has. Anyone who has played me knows I am significantly weaker.
-
I think disabling it makes a lot of sense. We are all so familiar with the game sounds that we'll probably mentally be hearing them in our head as the game is being played anyway.
Doing that gives me the idea of dubbing in goal horns for games commentated while I'm at my grandparents'
-
I'll just add mine here.
1. Chicago
2. Pittsburgh
3. Buffalo
4. Vancouver
5. Quebec
6. St. Louis
7. Detroit
8. Winnipeg
9. NY Rangers
10. Toronto
11. Los Angeles
12. Calgary
13. Montreal
14. Washington
15. Hartford
16. Ottawa
-
Game 7 in OT is more exciting than a sweep. Sweeps are nice in that you have some time to scout other teams before the next round, but the series (or better yet the Stanley Cup) coming right down to sudden death is amazingly exciting. I've never seen an overtime game 7 in real life, but I bet it's really tense, both teams trying as hard as possible to slip up.
Game 7 OT is also the sign of a good series, both teams fighting hard to win. The best series would probably be all 1-0 games decided in multiple overtimes, with game seven going to three, for or maybe even five. It might feel more fulfilling as well, because you know you earned the series instead of just rolling over an easy opponent or winning in forfeit.
-
Well, I got three more right but flubbed Philadelphia/Boston in SNES A
-
setar..we'll have a draft system in place...see top post for details...thanks for joining!
94kid and rudy..ive signed you guys up as well..thanks
I know, I was joking.
I just hope I get first pick, I don't think I'll do any good with a team other than Chicago.
-
Wow, that was a piece of crap! Your commentary sounds like the teacher in those Charlie Brown shows.
Show a good game not crap moron. I like to see game 7 not game 4 4-2 stupid
Thanks for realizing that at fifteen I can drive out to Radio Shack and get a microphone instead of having to use my headphones.</sarcasm>
-
Pretty neat. What are you using to record these?
The audio is a problem, though -- the game sound really drowns out the commentary. Maybe you could record the commentary separately later (just into a .wav file) and then mix them in VirtualDub (an AVI editor).
Camtasia Studio to record, VirtualDub to compress.
I've been looking for something in Gens to turn down the sound, but no go so far...might just have to disable it entirely. I'm trying to speak over it though, I raise my voice a bit in game four when the game sounds come on.
-
You screwed up my picks, but from the way that looks, I might have you as a dark horse to go deep.
-
Damn, I was stupid for picking Quebec over Pittsburgh in SNES B.
-
I don't know if I have a spot in A League next season or not, but if for some reason I do and AngryJay doesn't, I would feel obligated to turn the spot over to him. He is much more deserving than I am, as his winning record with a mediocre team proves.
Plus he owns me lately in heads up play. Here is a link to a very short highlight reel of our last match - complete with commentary, which seems to be all the rage these days. He's the blue team, I'm the red team:
"Sorry, you must be 18 or over to watch this video."
-
I'll play. I call Chicago >_>
-
Overall record: 49-11 (.817 overall win percentage, 60 out of 60 series played)
Congratulations to the champions! Here's hopes for another good season for Marc, Cash Money and hopes for a three-peat for JotaC!
Picks - Stanley Cup Finals (Record: 3-1/.750, 4 out of 4 series played)
Gens A - (West 1) Chicago (32-8) vs. (East 2) Hartford (27-6-0-7) - Hartford in 7 (Chicago wins series 4-3)
Gens B - (East 3) Pittsburgh (23-13-0-4) vs. (West 3) St. Louis (32-8) - St. Louis in 6 (St. Louis wins series 4-2)
SNES A - (East 2) Pittsburgh (29-8-3) vs. (West 5) St. Louis (11-15-0-14) - St. Louis in 7 (St. Louis wins series 4-0)
SNES B - (West 5) Dallas (18-16-6) vs. (East 8) Philadelphia (5-29-0-6) - Dallas in 7 (Dallas wins series 4-3)
Conference Final (Record: 8-0/1.000, 8 out of 8 series played)
Gens A - Wales: (2) Hartford vs. (5) Boston (19-18-3) - Hartford in 6 (Hartford wins series 4-0)
Gens A - Campbell: (1) Chicago vs. (3) Detroit (28-12) - Chicago in 7 (Chicago wins series 4-3)
Gens B - Wales: (1) New York Rangers (23-16-1) vs. (3) Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh in 7 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-3)
Gens B - Campbell: (1) Chicago (37-3) vs. (3) St. Louis - St. Louis in 7 (St. Louis wins series 4-1)
SNES A - Wales: (2) Pittsburgh vs. (4) Philadelphia (15-13-9-3) - Pittsburgh in 7 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-0)
SNES A - Campbell: (3) Winnipeg (26-14) vs. (5) St. Louis (11-15-0-14) - St. Louis in 7 (St. Louis wins series 4-3)
SNES B - Wales (5) Pittsburgh (21-13-6) vs. (8) Philadelphia - Philadelphia in 6 (Philadelphia wins series 4-0)
SNES B - Campbell: (2) Chicago (24-16) vs. (5) Dallas - Dallas in 7 (Dallas wins series 4-1)
Conference Semifinal (Record: 14-2/.875, 16 out of 16 series played)
Gens A - Wales
(2) Hartford vs. (8) Pittsburgh (15-25) - Hartford in 7 (Hartford wins series 4-2)
(5) Boston vs. (6) Quebec (19-20-1) - Boston in 7 (Boston wins series 4-2)
Gens A - Campbell
(1) Chicago vs. (4) Vancouver (20-20) - Chicago in 6 (Chicago wins series 4-0)
(2) Winnipeg (30-9-0-1) vs. (3) Detroit - Detroit in 7 (Detroit wins series 4-2)
Gens B - Wales
(1) New York Rangers vs. (7) New York Islanders (14-23-3) - Rangers in 7 (Rangers win series 4-2)
(3) Pittsburgh vs. (5) Washington (15-15-2-8) - Pittsburgh in 5 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-1)
Gens B - Campbell
(1) Chicago vs. (4) Toronto (27-13) - Chicago in 6 (Chicago wins series 4-3)
(2) Vancouver (30-10) vs. (3) St. Louis - St. Louis in 6 (St. Louis wins series 4-2)
SNES A - Wales
(2) Pittsburgh vs. (8) Montreal (3-25-0-12) - Pittsburgh in 7 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-2)
(3) Hartford (24-10-6) vs. (4) Philadelphia - Hartford in 6 (Philadelphia wins series 4-2)
SNES A - Campbell
(1) Detroit (31-8-1) vs. (5) St. Louis - St. Louis in 6 (St. Louis wins series 4-2)
(2) Los Angeles (15-15-0-10) vs. (3) Winnipeg - Winnipeg in 7 (Winnipeg wins series 4-1)
SNES B - Wales
(2) Buffalo (23-12-5) vs. (8) Philadelphia - Philadelphia in 7 (Philadelphia wins series 4-2)
(3) Montreal (28-10-2) vs. (5) Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh in 7 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-0)
SNES B - Campbell
(1) Los Angeles (30-7-1-2) vs. (5) Dallas - Los Angeles in 7 (Dallas wins series 4-2)
(2) Chicago vs. (3) Calgary (27-12-1) - Chicago in 6 (Chicago wins series 4-3)
First Round (Record: 24-8/.750, 32 out of 32 series played)
Gens A - Wales
(1) Washington (28-10-2) vs. (8) Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh in 6 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-0)
(2) Hartford vs. (7) Florida (17-20-3) - Hartford in 4 (Hartford wins series 4-0)
(3) Philadelphia (24-16) vs. (6) Quebec - Philadelphia in 6 (Quebec wins series 4-0)
(4) Montreal (20-17-3) vs. (5) Boston - Boston in 7 (Boston wins series 4-0)
Gens A - Campbell
(1) Chicago vs. (8) Dallas (12-25-0-3) - Chicago in 4 (Chicago wins series 4-0)
(2) Winnipeg vs. (7) Calgary (15-25) - Winnipeg in 4 (Winnipeg wins series 4-0)
(3) Detroit vs. (6) Los Angeles (16-24) - Detroit in 6 (Detroit wins series 4-1)
(4) Vancouver vs. (5) Toronto (20-20) - Vancouver in 7 (Vancouver wins series 4-3)
Gens B - Wales
(1) N.Y. Rangers vs. (8) Montreal (15-18-1) - Rangers in 5 (NYR wins series 4-0)
(2) Buffalo (17-20-3) vs. (7) N.Y. Islanders - Buffalo in 6 (NYI wins series 4-1)
(3) Pittsburgh vs. (6) Boston (20-16-4) - Pittsburgh in 6 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-1)
(4) Quebec (15-23-2) vs. (5) Washington - Quebec in 5 (Washington wins series 4-1)
Gens B - Campbell
(1) Chicago vs. (8) Los Angeles (12-26-2) - Chicago in 4 (Chicago wins series 4-0)
(2) Vancouver vs. (7) Detroit (15-24-1) - Vancouver in 4 (Vancouver wins series 4-3)
(3) St. Louis vs. (6) Edmonton (19-21) - St. Louis in 5 (St. Louis wins series 4-1)
(4) Toronto vs. (5) Winnipeg (24-16) - Toronto in 7 (Toronto wins series 4-2)
SNES A - Wales
(1) Quebec (32-6-2) vs. (8) Montreal - Quebec in 5 (Montreal wins series 4-3)
(2) Pittsburgh vs. (7) Buffalo (4-22-0-14) - Pittsburgh in 4 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-0)
(3) Hartford vs. (6) N.Y. Rangers (16-11-4-9) - Hartford in 5 (Hartford wins series 4-0)
(4) Philadelphia vs. (5) Boston (18-16-6) - Boston in 6 (Philadelphia wins series 4-0)
SNES A - Campbell
(1) Detroit vs. (8) Calgary (4-20-0-16) - Detroit in 5 (Detroit wins series 4-0)
(2) Los Angeles vs. (7) Edmonton (6-14-0-20) - Los Angeles in 4 (Los Angeles wins series 4-0)
(3) Winnipeg vs. (6) Vancouver (8-15-0-17) - Winnipeg in 4 (Winnipeg wins series 4-1)
(4) Chicago (22-11-1-6) vs. (5) St. Louis - Chicago in 6 (St. Louis wins series 4-3)
SNES B - Wales
(1) Boston (25-15) vs. (8) Philadelphia - Boston in 5 (Philadelphia wins series 4-2)
(2) Buffalo vs. (7) Toronto (17-23) - Buffalo in 6 (Buffalo wins series 4-1)
(3) Montreal vs. (6) N.Y. Rangers (22-6-12) - Montreal in 4 (Montreal wins series 4-1)
(4) Quebec (17-22-0-1) vs. (5) Pittsburgh - Quebec in 6 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-1)
SNES B - Campbell
(1) Los Angeles vs. (8) San Jose (8-27-5) - Los Angeles in 4 (Los Angeles wins series 4-0)
(2) Chicago vs. (7) Vancouver (11-24-0-5) - Chicago in 4 (Chicago wins series 4-0)
(3) Calgary vs. (6) Winnipeg (8-31-1) - Calgary in 4 (Calgary wins series 4-3)
(4) St. Louis (24-10-6) vs. (5) Dallas - Dallas in 6 (Dallas wins series 4-3)
-
If Deer posts his predictions, so am I. I'm 3-0 in Gens btw.
SNES A - Wales
(1) Quebec (32-6-2) vs. (8) Montreal (3-25-0-12) - Quebec in 5
(2) Pittsburgh (29-8-3) vs. (7) Buffalo (4-22-0-14) - Pittsburgh in 4
(3) Hartford (24-10-6) vs. (6) N.Y. Rangers (16-11-4-9) - Hartford in 5
(4) Philadelphia (15-13-9-3) vs. (5) Boston (18-16-6) - Boston in 6
SNES A - Campbell
(1) Detroit (31-8-1) vs. (8) Calgary (4-20-0-16) - Detroit in 5
(2) Los Angeles (15-15-0-10) vs. (7) Edmonton (6-14-0-20) - Los Angeles in 4
(3) Winnipeg (26-14) vs. (6) Vancouver (8-15-0-17) - Winnipeg in 4
(4) Chicago (22-11-1-6) vs. (5) St. Louis (11-15-0-14) - Chicago in 6
-
Game 1:
Game two was rejected for being too long, I hope to get game 3 and 4 up, and I might trim the end off game 2.
Edit: Game 4, IMO a better one:
-
... and gameplay, since GENS is completely different...
I never really noticed differences between SNES and GENS...
-
I'm actually allowing Gens and SNES players to play, and the "home" advantage will also be a platform one. Not like cross-platform is really hard, if you find out what does what you can map the shoot button on Gens to the one you use normally, the only difference will likely be graphics and sound.
-
-
Next season we're drafting teams in reverse standings order, aren't we? It'll balance out over a couple seasons, and you'll probably come out on top by being good with bad teams. Washington and SJ are hardly 'average' teams
Maybe we can make the team picking order a little random, like the entry draft for the NHL, so people get some variety, season after season. Teams up from B get the best chances to get an early pick. The worse your regular season record, you earlier you pick. To discourage throwing games during the season, your playoff performance would also affect your team draft position.
Pittsburgh isn't that tough if you check them a lot. I didn't make the playoffs and I had a 2-2 record against kgboy (total goals, 15-14 for kgboy), and when I won the two games, I was challenging for a playoff spot, so you can't say he wasn't trying. I wouldn't even say Pittsburgh is one of the top 5 teams. You can bully them, unlike teams like Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Montreal, Calgary, and even Quebec...
The only team I would consider banning is Chicago, since they have the best player and the best goalie (arguably). But.. why not let someone who finished poorly the last season have a fun season : ). Just say that Chicago has to be picked in the top 5 or not at all.
San Jose are underrated. The AI works wonders with them. However, the worst team IS Ottawa, and the champion from last year should be stuck with Ottawa if we do draft.
If we don't, I'm going to be making sure I'm one of the first to register so I get Chicago. Unlike most, I practice with them sometimes and can actually use the TEAM. Chicago are good for anyone, but if you can use them as a team, everyone else is screwed. Except for LA, because I can't seem to beat them.
-
I'll put up my predictions for round one here. Note that for the records I omitted Ties and DNPs if they had 0 in both, and just DNPs if they had no DNPs.
My record so far: 4-0
Gens A - Wales
(1) Washington (28-10-2) vs. (8) Pittsburgh (15-25) - Pittsburgh in 6 (Pittsburgh wins series 4-0)
(2) Hartford (27-6-0-7) vs. (7) Florida (17-20-3) - Hartford in 4
(3) Philadelphia (24-16) vs. (6) Quebec (19-20-1) - Philadelphia in 6
(4) Montreal (20-17-3) vs. (5) Boston (19-18-3) - Boston in 7
Gens A - Campbell
(1) Chicago (32-8) vs. (8) Dallas (12-25-0-3) - Chicago in 4
(2) Winnipeg (30-9-0-1) vs. (7) Calgary (15-25) - Winnipeg in 4 (Winnipeg wins series 4-0)
(3) Detroit (28-12) vs. (6) Los Angeles (16-24) - Detroit in 6 (Detroit wins series 4-1)
(4) Vancouver (20-20) vs. (5) Toronto (20-20) - Vancouver in 7 (Vancouver wins series 4-3)
Gens B - Wales
(1) N.Y. Rangers (23-16-1) vs. (8) Montreal (15-18-1) - Rangers in 5
(2) Buffalo (17-20-3) vs. (7) N.Y. Islanders (14-23-3) - Buffalo in 6
(3) Pittsburgh (23-13-0-4) vs. (6) Boston (20-16-4) - Pittsburgh in 6 (Series tied 1-1)
(4) Quebec (15-23-2) vs. (5) Washington (15-15-2-8) - Quebec in 5
Gens B - Campbell
(1) Chicago (37-3) vs. (8) Los Angeles (12-26-2) - Chicago in 4
(2) Vancouver (30-10) vs. (7) Detroit (15-24-1) - Vancouver in 4
(3) St. Louis (32-8) vs. (6) Edmonton (19-21) - St. Louis in 5 (St. Louis leads series 2-1)
(4) Toronto (27-13) vs. (5) Winnipeg (24-16) - Toronto in 7
SNES A - Wales
(1) Quebec (32-6-2) vs. (8) Montreal (3-25-0-12) - Quebec in 5
(2) Pittsburgh (29-8-3) vs. (7) Buffalo (4-22-0-14) - Pittsburgh in 4
(3) Hartford (24-10-6) vs. (6) N.Y. Rangers (16-11-4-9) - Hartford in 5
(4) Philadelphia (15-13-9-3) vs. (5) Boston (18-16-6) - Boston in 6
SNES A - Campbell
(1) Detroit (31-8-1) vs. (8) Calgary (4-20-0-16) - Detroit in 5
(2) Los Angeles (15-15-0-10) vs. (7) Edmonton (6-14-0-20) - Los Angeles in 4
(3) Winnipeg (26-14) vs. (6) Vancouver (8-15-0-17) - Winnipeg in 4
(4) Chicago (22-11-1-6) vs. (5) St. Louis (11-15-0-14) - Chicago in 6
SNES B - Wales
(1) Boston (25-15) vs. (8) Philadelphia (5-29-0-6) - Boston in 5
(2) Buffalo (23-12-5) vs. (7) Toronto (17-23) - Buffalo in 6 (Buffalo leads series 3-1)
(3) Montreal (28-10-2) vs. (6) N.Y. Rangers (22-6-12) - Montreal in 4
(4) Quebec (17-22-0-1) vs. (5) Pittsburgh (21-13-6) - Quebec in 6
SNES B - Campbell
(1) Los Angeles (30-7-1-2) vs. (8) San Jose (8-27-5) - Los Angeles in 4
(2) Chicago (24-16) vs. (7) Vancouver (11-24-0-5) - Chicago in 4
(3) Calgary (27-12-1) vs. (6) Edmonton (13-16-7-4) - Calgary in 4
(4) St. Louis (24-10-6) vs. (5) Dallas (18-16-6) - St. Louis in 6
-
Addisonbr did badly in Gens A using Edmonton, missing the playoffs. However, in Gens B, he used Chicago and had a record of 37-3. I'd use the worse record, as Chicago quite obviously isn't an accurate measure of how good you are.
-
Common Crossbar, give Kgboy some credit. Lemeuix falls down when your breathe on em. Easily the most overrated player in the game.
It's the playoffs. They say anything can happen.
Roenick also falls down when you breathe on him. I've seen GRETZKY lay Roenick out.
-
LA are a better team than the game says. I'm usually good with Chicago, but LA just murder me.
Pittsburgh, though, aren't really that good. Aside from Mario and Jagr, they're average. I usually just key on Mario and Jagr. Last time I played someone who used Pittsburgh, I beat them 6-2 with Chicago.
Running topic for my (and others') playoff predictions
in General Discussion
Posted
Gar, upset mania! Drops my win percentage to .667
Ever since rattling off 7-0 to start I'm now 5-6.