The Deer Posted November 2, 2006 Report Share Posted November 2, 2006 I know we have always done it like the real NHL; division winners get seeded 1-2 regardless of overall point totals. However, that would seem to not make much sense this year, as there are some divisions where everyone is below .500. Example- the Adams in SNES B, or the Smythe in SNES A. Think we should just rank em 1-8 based on overall points this time around? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePimpImp Posted November 2, 2006 Report Share Posted November 2, 2006 No division in SNES b is all below .500 close and as of yesterday morning yes but now, I'm a spicy 2 games above lol. I need to learn to play better d again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
addisonbr Posted November 2, 2006 Report Share Posted November 2, 2006 I know we have always done it like the real NHL; division winners get seeded 1-2 regardless of overall point totals.However, that would seem to not make much sense this year, as there are some divisions where everyone is below .500. Example- the Adams in SNES B, or the Smythe in SNES A. Think we should just rank em 1-8 based on overall points this time around? I wouldn't personally be in favor of switching horses mid-stream, but it's worth considering for next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.