Jump to content
NHL'94 Forums

Brutus

Members
  • Posts

    2,847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Posts posted by Brutus

  1. Ok vote in/out & then one of 4 options 

    Plablegs 3 is a draft based off of nhl94 rosters, no wbf, static, no penalties w/ B check still fully functional, boosted goalies & quick goalie switch control w/ increase roaming range.  We just finished Plablegs 2.

    Et tu Brute is a draft involving players from all eras mixing up draft pool of players each season w/ nhl94 & other older roms/newer roms, supposed to be a keeper league, & is WBF, static optional, no goalie boosts, . Ideally anyone playing in this is committed to several seasons.  Last time, it ran great but we lost over half the league by the time it would run again, so it would be a fresh restart with no keepers from season 1.

     

    THIRD OPTION is a new idea similar to an old league.  First we run a draft of teams.  After each coach picks his team, each coach then picks his starting lineup from the team.  All remaining players PLUS all players from teams not selected will be dumped into a draft pool.  Draft order for 5 rounds will be based off of coaching talent plus team selection (if you have Detroit, you will likely not be picking first!!).  After this, trades will be allowed.  

    IF this league is selected, we would use NO WBF, penalties w/ reduced times, static optional, no goalie boost to ratings.

    4th league is the old idea, the Dynasty league.  It is an AUCTION based league, where you bid on players instead of draft them.  It's keeper based with a salary cap and each season player's ratings change.

    Season starts with 1990 ROM, where whatever players are in that ROM and their ratings is what will be used for Season 1.  Then, in season 2, it goes to 1991 ROM, where if your guy retired in real life 1990, he is no longer available on the 1991 ROM, so no longer on your team.  Any NEW rookies in the 1991 ROM plus any free agents would be bid on again in the off season before Season 2.  And then repeat all the way say to 1997.   These ROMs/Ratings would be posted well ahead of the auction, and a salary cap system, contract length based system would be used.

  2. Fair enough.  Old League Stats is a good enough marker for me.  I wouldn't bother trying to combine them if it's not easy.

     

    Those curious can go look, like I did.  I don't think it's worth actual "WORK", with 90% of them not even active any longer.

  3. Tex, you lead the site in GAMES PLAYED by a lot (not including the "old stats"). 

    I'm assuming this comes from the addition of Coach's leagues & of Skip's VHL, as I've played in almost all the leagues over the past 5 years except those, and you are way ahead of me in games played , not using "old stats".  (IS THERE A REASON WE CAN'T COMBINE THEM??) @chaos

     

    Both of them use ROMs that I think have some home/away advantages built into them, and I know some of Coach's ROMs used to use exaggerated advantages for being home.  Might explain a better HOME record for a guy who prefers heading down over up.

     

     

  4. Play-In series:

    #10 Hartford (Chaos) vs #7 NYR (Lupz)
    #9 Toronto (Jer) vs #8 Anaheim (JMJ)

    #1 #7 re-seeded ( lowest ranked to win from 2 play-in series) vs #1 Pittsburgh (Raph)
    #2 #8 re-seeded (highest ranked to win from 2 play-in series) vs #2 St Louis (Brutus)

    #6 Quebec (Skip) vs #3 Chicago(Dicicion)
    #5 Tampa Bay (J&J) vs #4 Dallas (Tex)

    Best of 7, 2-2-1-1-1 format.

    RE-SEED after each round.

  5. On 1/25/2018 at 11:51 AM, skip said:

     

    San Jose/ Brutus

    First Line:
    LW - Kessel
    C    - Seguin
    RW - Vorecek
    LD  -Weber
    RD  - Suter
    G    - Jones
    X    - Nash

    Second Line:
    LW - Nash
    C     - Seguin
    RW -Vorecek
    LD  - Werenski
    RD  - Suter
    X    - Kessel 

    3rd line

    LD Shattenkirk

    LW Ehlers

    IF you set your lines the same all the way through but only change LD & LW in each line, then it sets those guys to sub in next, in the order from scoring line 2-4.

    so, in this setting my subs on offense for all three forwards will be Nash, then Ehlers.  My sub for either defensive slot will go Werenski then Johns.

    • Like 1
  6. Playoffs will start February 5th, as season ends basically, the previous night.

    Format will go:

    7th seed vs 10th seed has a playin series.
    8th seed vs 9th seed has a playin series.

    These will be labeled Rd 1.

    Winners of those 2 series will then be re-seeded to form the #7 & the 8th seed.

    #1 vs #8, #2 vs #7, #3 vs #6, #4 vs #5 for Rd 2.

    Re-seeding after Rd 2, so it then Rd 3 is:
    #1 vs #4, #2 vs #3, and then re-seed for home ice

    Rd 4:
    #1 vs #2 for finals champ.

     

    WE ALSO will have a B formatted playoffs.  Anyone finishing the season sub .500, will be given the chance to enter.  I realize this means we might have a team in both brackets, but we don't have enough teams to run A & B playoffs without some teams doubling up.

    I'll update this part when all teams have played 28 games.

     

    • Like 1
  7. Ok, season is well under way.  Originally setup as a 6 game a week pace starting on Jan 2nd, this is how it was set up.

    Monday Jan 8th, 6 games
    Monday Jan 15th, 12 games
    Monday Jan 22nd, 18 games
    Monday Jan 29th, 24 games
    Monday Feb 5th, 28 games (actual deadline is Sunday night at 3 am eastern, which is technically Monday Feb 5th).

    I will log in Monday morning and post the DNP's and playoff standings.

    As of the time of this post, no coach is behind schedule, and Tex is of course already finished!

     

    As for PLAYOFFS, they will start on that Monday.  I will post separately about the actual format that will be used in the coming days.

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...