Jump to content
NHL'94 Forums

tru

Banned
  • Posts

    827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by tru

  1. On 9/11/2017 at 10:17 PM, aqualizard said:

    I would say:
    Step 1: Make a near perfect clone.
    Step 2: Make sure it is bug free, and plays like NHL94 was supposed to
    Step 3: THEN add enhancements

    I even think the pixel art angle is cool.  I vote for keeping it pixelated!

     

    this is what Zelda Classic did.  by 1.90 they had added and tested so many features that it was at the level equivalent to our reasonable dreams.  this was like fifteen years ago, too.  based on NES, incorporating SNES-level concepts, it isn't a perfect parallel, but the advances in technology surely make up that gap in relevance.  only the most advanced NES Zelda players would know the replication wasn't the original.  minute precision was mimicked well.  it is doable.

  2. On 8/9/2016 at 8:04 PM, Uncle Seth said:

    ....When players are very cold and you have several of them out there, their agility and speed are severely affected and noticeable....I'm known for my love affair of of non-elite players in the average range. But it's a love-hate relationship. When they're very cold....big nosedive....agility and speed are closely related so when they BOTH take a hit, you get the sluggish, skating-in-sand effect....Those who don't notice these effects are simply not very perceptive....If you think guys are sluggish in a given game, check their ratings and compare it to their average ratings. You'll see it's no mystery why they feel like they're wearing cement boots.

    who are you and why are you in my brain?!  I didn't post that?!

  3. On 1/7/2017 at 11:40 AM, tru said:

    it seems that I now come to get frustrated trying to navigate, use, read the message board.  this forum downgrade was a terrible idea.

    unless the intent was to please Clocky by frustrating me away -- in that case it was a great success.  this message board used to be easy to navigate and use.  I promise it was!  I remember!  posts-per-day counts must have been cut in half, at least, immediately.  it clearly has not recovered.  this place is devoid of content now.  I am sure plenty of previously-active members fell off right when I did.  sad.

  4. can we go back to the old forum, with unruined avatars, intact signature images, a manageable "view new content" option, less wasted space, easier to view and navigate menus... you know, stuff that worked.  why was it necessary to break what was working?

×
×
  • Create New...