Jump to content
NHL'94 Forums

92 Skater Ratings


CoachMac

Recommended Posts

92 uses the 16 point rating system that '93 does not the 7 point rating system that 94 does.

Weight is generally lower than in '94 which was mostly accurate.

Gretzky weighed 172 in 94 he weighs 148 in 92.

Lemieux weighed 220 in 94 he weighs 212 in 92.

It varies but almost everyone is at least 1 click less.

Agility, Speed, Shot Power, Checking and Stickhandling are first based on how good the team was and will be explained in more detail below.

Offensive Awareness is based on Points per game.

Top 5 (> 1.45) Gretzky to Recchi = 100

Next 12 (1.31-1.44) = 93

Next 22 (1.12-1.30) = 86

Next 37 (0.97-1.11) = 80

etc....73/66/60/53/46/40/33/20/13/6/0

I have this broken down all the way if anyone is interested.

Defensive Awareness is based on +/- per game.

MacInnis, Fleury, McSorley, Doug Wilson = 100

Not sure of the exact formula for this but it is the metric used.

Handedness is mostly accurate.

Petr Klima should be a righty and he is listed lefty.

A couple others I can't think of right now.

Shot Accuracy.

Is based on Shooting percentage.

This was held over and used in 93 and 94 as well.

Personally it drives me crazy.

Peter Zezel (100) and Mikko Makela (100) did not have a more accurate shot than Gretzky (80) and Lemieux (86)

Even if their shooting percentage said so. This rewards guys who did not shoot much.

Endurance.

It is 100, 66, or 33 for everybody.

Vast majority got 66.

The 100's were mostly for stars.

Roughness (Shot Bias)

Based on shots taken.

Hull, Yzerman, Bourque, MacInnis (Top 4) = 100

Passing.

Is based on Assist per game. I love that they used this. Should have kept for 93 and 94.

You can really tell the good passers in 92.

It was different for forwards and d-men.

100 = Forwards (>1.48) Gretzky and Oates and Dmen (>0.90) Leetch, MacInnis, Bourque, Coffey

93 = Forward NA and d-men (0.65-0.89) 10 players

86 = Forwards NA and d-men (0.50-0.64) 10 players

80 = Forwards (0.86-1.47) 11 players and d-men (0.42-0.49) 10 players

etc...73/66/60/53/46/40/33/26/20/13/6/0

I have this broken down all the way if anyone is interested.

Fighting/Aggression is based on PIM.

This makes things interesting as some who took lots of penalties but did not fight score highly.

Peluso, Probert, Berube, and Odjick are the 100's.

The best thing is anybody will brawl even if they rate 0.

And if they do rate 0 you can knock them out with one punch.

Agility, Speed, Shot Power, Checking and Stickhandling:

These 5 very important ratings are random and only somewhat based in reality. They are more about making players and teams good. Cam Neely is 100/100 in speed and agility. Alexander Mogilny is 73/73. They are hard to figure out but do follow these rules per team.

8 Top Tier Teams (>88 points and/or Cup Finalist) Individual Player Rankings in:

Speed/Agility/Checking/ShPow/StH

100/80/60/40/20/0

Boston, Calgary, Chicago, LA, Minnesota, Montreal, Pittsburgh, St. Louis

7 Middle Tier Teams (73-85 points) Individual Player Rankings in:

Speed/Agility/Checking/ShPow/StH

100/93/73/53/33/13/0

Buffalo, Edmonton, Hartford, New Jersey, NY Rangers, Philly, Washington

6 Lower Tier Teams (46-76 points) Individual Player Rankings in:

Speed/Agility/Checking/ShPow/StH

86/66/46/26/6/0

Detroit*, NY Islanders, Quebec, Toronto, Vancouver, Winnipeg

* Detroit's stickhandling is different about half have 93/73/53/33/13

and half have 86/66/46/26/6 and then Federov has 60.

Detroit and Hartford really should have been switched.

1 Expansion Team Individual Player Rankings in:

Speed/Agility/Checking/ShPow/StH

13 players use the lower tier ratings, 3 use the middle tier, and 4 use the upper tier.

San Jose

The players seem purely fictional as I could not match anyone to anything in the dispersal or expansion draft. Also I think it was released before those events.

Top 26 Players (based on overall)

Mario Lemieux 94

Wayne Gretzky 92

Tomas Sandstrom 91

Ray Bourque 88

Theo Fleury 85

Sergei Makarov 84

Mark Recchi 83

Cam Neely 82

Gary Suter 82

Brett Hull 81

Jeremy Roenick 81

Paul Coffey 81

Mark Messier 79

Steve Yzerman 79

Al MacInnis 78

Doug Wilson 78

Petr Klima 78

Chris Chelios 77

Adam Oates 77

John Cullen 77

Steve Duchesne 77

Denis Savard 77

Ron Francis 76

Craig Janney 75

Steve Larmer 75

Brian Leetch 75

Edited by CoachMac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the agility and the rest section makes no sense to me. what does it mean? you have something about 100/80/60... and something about 100/93/73... whatever. what is this? does it make sense to anybody else? are you saying that Boston is made of all guys who have 100 agility, 80 speed, 60 shot power....? no. what are you saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the agility and the rest section makes no sense to me. what does it mean? you have something about 100/80/60... and something about 100/93/73... whatever. what is this? does it make sense to anybody else? are you saying that Boston is made of all guys who have 100 agility, 80 speed, 60 shot power....? no. what are you saying?

I will use 2 forwards from a team in each tier to try and make this more clear.

Boston examples (Top tier team these attributes will be 100/80/60/40/20/0)

#8 AG 100 SP 100 ShP 80 Chk 100 Stick 40 (Cam Neely)

#27 AG 40 SP 40 ShP 60 Chk 40 Stick 80 (Dave Christian)

Edmonton examples (Middle Tier team these attributes will be 100/93/73/53/33/13/0)

#11 AG 100 SP 100 ShP 33 Chk 73 Stick 93 (Mark Messier)

#10 AG 73 SP 73 ShP 73 Chk 73 Stick 73 (Esa Tikkanen)

Toronto examples (Lower tier team these attributes will be 100/86/66/46/26/6/0)

#26 AG 66 SP 86 ShP 66 Chk 26 Stick 66 (Mike Krushelnyski)

#10 Ag 26 SP 46 ShP 46 Chk 26 Stick 86 (Vincent Damphousse)

All teams can have players ratings of 100 but the middle and lower tier teams have very few only real superstars like Messier and Yzerman.

For the most part a 100/93/86 are like a 5 in 94, a 80,73,66 are like a 4 in 94, a 60,53,46 are like a 3 in 94, 40/33/26 are like a 3, 20/13/6 are like a 2 in 94.

So the best teams will naturally be better.

All the other ratings are based on an actual stat.

Sorry if you don't get it, that is the best I can do. Look at it in NOSE while reading this and it will be more clear.

93 did a similar rating with tiered teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...