IceStorm70 Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 my estimate at seedings and matchups if no other games were played. Assuming -2pts for every game not played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 How about.. FF for ppl that dont show up and +2 for ppl that do? In the case of slackers you could just split the series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Russian Rocket Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 Always found it silly to punish both players when 1 made clear efforts to schedule and not the other. It isn't hard, did you post in scheduling or nah? If you didn't bother to check the forum in 2 weeks it's your own god damn fault Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HABS Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 Yeah current system makes no sense. The person trying to actually get games in should get +2 and not -2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceStorm70 Posted February 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 ya I don't know what the rule is or who's doing it, just putting up what'd it look like if that were the case. it should be in the rules for this year right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brutus Posted February 27, 2016 Report Share Posted February 27, 2016 Playoffs/Standings/Matchups, I've ONLY been using what is in place from all the previoius GDL's. The only thing I changed is the draft order, and how I was going to handle who would be allowed to be renewed. I thought in GDL, DNP's cost you playoff standing, but once you determined who is IN the playoffs, you then seeded everyone based on their WIN %. And, for Rounds 2 through Finals, no re-seeding. Someone correct me if I'm wrong about what WAS done, not what they want to be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Russian Rocket Posted February 27, 2016 Report Share Posted February 27, 2016 (edited) Playoffs/Standings/Matchups, I've ONLY been using what is in place from all the previoius GDL's. The only thing I changed is the draft order, and how I was going to handle who would be allowed to be renewed. I thought in GDL, DNP's cost you playoff standing, but once you determined who is IN the playoffs, you then seeded everyone based on their WIN %. And, for Rounds 2 through Finals, no re-seeding. Someone correct me if I'm wrong about what WAS done, not what they want to be done. Don't recall being punished if my opp was clearly unwilling to play. Not sure if we got +2 but we def didn't get -2. also #putmeincoach Edited February 27, 2016 by The Russian Rocket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Posted February 27, 2016 Report Share Posted February 27, 2016 Playoffs/Standings/Matchups, I've ONLY been using what is in place from all the previoius GDL's. The only thing I changed is the draft order, and how I was going to handle who would be allowed to be renewed. I thought in GDL, DNP's cost you playoff standing, but once you determined who is IN the playoffs, you then seeded everyone based on their WIN %. And, for Rounds 2 through Finals, no re-seeding. Someone correct me if I'm wrong about what WAS done, not what they want to be done. Pretty sure that format is for Blitz. Last GDL I assigned win/loss to the unplayed games by win percentage. Slackers always lost but in the case of two slackers I used win percentage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.