kingraph

Rock on, pops!

Kupuck and I played our games (WIN vs DAL GENS B-2) and posted them up in the "confirm scores" section earlier in the week -- do we have to log them in again, or will you update it on your end?

I voted 10 for customer service as I feel you guys do a great job with responding/moderating the forums. My only suggestion, as mentioned before, is some better organization. After getting used to the forums, I can follow the logic and navigate through with no real problems, but it does take some time getting used to. I just feel there may be a better way to organize it. Wish I could provide a better suggestion, but I haven't thought about it enough. Still, GREAT job guys.

I was thinking about this for a while too. I'm sure determining the mix between really good (weak A, good B ) players and newbies is difficult. I can see the reason for trying to group players by skill level, but a little mix is beneficial too. For example, the bottom rung of "A" players and the top rung of "B" players seem to be at the same level (depending on how you categorize, I've played both). They will do well in B, but not so well in A. However, and I think you'll agree, playing against "A" caliber players is the best way to learn and grow. I'm sure the same is true for lower-ranked B players who play the best in B. It seems to me, a new person who joined this classic season, that the Spring'10 season was best organized by skill level. It had the A B C divisions and that makes sense. There's definitely an "elite" level of players out there (A) who will beat any good B player consistently, those who are really good ( B ) players who can occasionally win an A. And the newbie level of C players and other players who can't improve in B. Looking at the standings, the player divisions seem correct. Most of you A leaguers all know each others' skill level at this point and would agree with the divisions (with the occasional gripe). As someone who took over Winnipeg in the middle of the season for the A division this year, I got to play against a bunch of A players (as well as exhibitions) and I learned the most from playing people better than me. (in my defense, I also managed to win a few games). Now that I'm hooked on '94 again, my goal, as is Comeback's and all other '94 addicts, is to get into that A league and compete with the best of them! However, the only way to get better is to play the best. At the end of the day, I don't know what is best -- skill parity or mixing it up. Pros and Cons for both. Either way, major kudos to Chaos and Halifax for organizing this league. It's not easy, and you guys do a great job. Simply said, this is f'in awesome. I'll be back next season for sure.

Game 1 DAL 3 @ WIN 4 (WIN 1 - 0) Game 2 DAL 7 @ WIN 6 (TIED 1-1) Game 3 WIN 3 @ DAL 4 (DAL 2-1) Game 4 WIN 5 @ DAL 8 (DAL 3-1) Game 5 DAL 6 @ WIN 2 (DAL 4-1)

Sounds good, I should be around Saturday evening as well.

I got my last four games with you -- let me know your schedule.

Looking forward to playing, brah. My name is misspelled in the roster on this forum, but that's okay brah, it's correct in the game and everywhere else. Go USA...brah.

I got Dallas for my rookie season in the Spring'11 classic, I was happy because I love SPEED! I always felt Dallas was a stronger team than indicated by the ratings, particularly with no line changes. I flip-flop with Modano at center (with Courtnall and Broten on wings). One thing to mention is when Modano is at Center, you can throw Courtnall, the only reliable righty, on the LW. As you mentioned, he has enough juice in his shot to slap it in with some consistency. However, as I quickly found out, most of the players in this league are pretty adept at manual goalie, and those slappers get stopped easily. The other reason I like Courtnall on the wing is his speed allows him to get a quick chance at a goal right from the faceoff. Thanks for the write-up, great as usual.

#56 Righty

If it's not too late count me in for USA

Mike Richter save on Pavel Bure penalty shot in Game 4 of the 1994 finals. Maybe I'm a homer, but I'm surprised that wasn't included in this list!

Thanks, looking forward to playing you guys. I'm usually available late nights during the week, and randomly on weekends. Just IM me and I'll respond. AIM: oooraphooo

I guess it doesn't affect me now as I played Wags as Boston for our 1 and 1. However, I'm looking forward to getting TROUNCED in the playoffs (assuming I make them)

Just noticed in the homepage that STAN1SH is now the owner of Boston (used to be WagsTH), but I didn't see an announcement.

Please add me to the official waiting list. AIM: kingraph

Happy to fill in a GENS A if needed (also playing GENSB-2 now)

DAL is great with me! Thank you!

All set up and ready for a test game -- tomorrow (Friday) after 9:00 p.m. EST, or pick a time this weekend. Hope to play in the Spring league! AIM: oooraphooo

Hello all! I'm looking forward to playing in the upcoming season! AIM: oooraphooo I will be requesting a GENS test game later tonight when I get set up at home.

I'm and old NHL94 GENS player, but new here. GREAT site. Has anybody noticed that one-timers (successful ones) don't get counted as a successful pass in the game stats? It used to drive me nuts. I didn't see it mentioned in the forums or game bugs. Cheers!