Wittgenstein

I haven't seen a post on here about how aim is dead (literally). Are there any other programs or apps that the 94 community is using to communicate? (I'm gonna miss the late night 94 aim chats with everyone )

As all good Canucks fans know, spread love, not hate.

I'd like to see John Williams write an original score for the documentary. (If he's out of the price range, maybe Jon Brion?)

The biggest thing being overlooked here is the context of the play. Yes, lag spikes are part of the game. If it were a season game, I would agree, you should bite the bullet and take the spiked goal and move on. However, this was a tied critical game in the finals with a few minutes left in the third... and it was between two veterans who aren't named wags or dcicon. I think most people would expect a vet (thus making it an unwritten rule) to give back the spiked goal and try to win in a legitimate fashion, rather than take the win on a quasi-legitmate goal. ... And I think that's the bigge

If the argument was that the puck was already going in before the lag, it should count. If the argument is that it's a tough break (equivalent to a tough "bounce"), you're allowed to exploit someone who's not playing/can't play during a 5 second lag-glitch (especially during a tie game in the third during the finals), that's sketchy at best. Maybe it's not a written rule, but it's definitely not cool move.

Sorry guys, I was really looking forward to this league, but work has been unexpecetdly crazy for me this month... and with the holidays coming up, too, there's no real prospect of me having the free time to get an entire season in. (I haven't even had enough time, as it is, to get any games in.)

We talked last weekend about playing during the week, but never ran into each other. I'll PM him.

Sure why not?

Hampus Lindholm

marian gaborik

6.7 Justin Faulk

5.12 Alex Steen

4.7 Ryan Suter

3.12 nicklas backstrom

2.7 Oilers take Carey Price